HDR Projects OTOH has a ton of controls, plus loads of presets so you don't get bogged down trying to use all those controls, but when you're done you're no longer working with RAW images. dng RAW format, so you can continue to work with the maximum amount of data, but it doesn't do anything fancy - the only settings are for ghosting. If you've got RAW images, Adobe Lightroom is the only software that takes them & saves the result in their open. Software then 1st aligns, then combines the images. overexposed to capture more shadow detail, underexposed to get highlights that aren't blown out. To do HDR photography you take 2 or more photos with your camera at different exposure settings, e.g. You can see a couple of great examples here: photoshopcafecom/tutorials/HDR_ps/hdr-ps.htm The exception, where HDR photography can make a big difference, is when you're trying to capture an image of a scene with poor lighting that you either can't control, or where you want to use only natural lighting. Which in a nutshell is why there's all this hype in the 1st place, to convince you to spend your money. And since regular video & photos are pretty good at that all ready, the difference with UHD & HDR can be pretty subtle. And like all advertising hype, it's not necessarily accurate - 1) you can use the same sort of FX without the UHD or HDR parts, & 2), UHD & HDR really mean that you have more data to work with, so that you can show a wider gamut or more full range of colors, closer to what we see with our eyes. There's Lots of advertising hype promoting a more stylistic image, with exaggerated colors &/or FX, for both UHD video & HDR photography or images. If not, if you just want to create more dramatic images, HDR Projects is likely for you, whether you want to do HDR or not - it can apply its FX with or without the HDR part. Whether their HDR Projects is for you depends mostly on whether you're after realism or not. Keep up the great work! Save | Cancelįranzis sells some very good software - pretty much the only complaints I've ever read in reviews & such is that the brand tends to be a bit harder to use &/or require a bit more learning than average. Keep up the great work!Īll around a wonderful piece of software, just have a few qualms about the UI. Do I need to save a state to undo? And where's the reset button for both an individual image, as well as the whole project? Do I really need to load in the images and apply the initial processing again just to start over?Īll around a wonderful piece of software, just have a few qualms about the UI. No hot-swapping colors and then editing the wrong image.Īnd then Ctrl-Z appears not to do anything. I want to be able to edit a five bracketed exposure and just toggle with QWERT (count it, it's five). And have scroll bars.Īlso, there should be more than red green blue for paint colors. I would also like to be able to hit a modifier key or MMB and have it transform into a drag tool. Also, is there a drag tool? I apologize if there is, but I couldn't find any. Next, if I have my cursor over a certain area and scroll in, it should zoom into that area. But I see that was addressed in later versions, so enough said. True some menus have shortcuts, but in my opinion, it's inexcusable for any software at this price point not to have a full suite of shortcuts. All the brush types, as well as increasing brush size and opacity, changing brush color, preview modes, toggling images on/off, and different program modes (Raw, Edit Weights, etc.) should have shortcuts that are user assignable. There is no reason there are no shortcuts for the commonly used tools. I'm not sure what improvements were implemented in the later versions of the software, but here are some things that I think can be improved in this version:įirstly, keyboard shortcuts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |